EssayBay Writers' Guarantees
Here are the guarantees that writers can offer their clients. Writers, remember,
you need to be realistic - make sure you can fulfill the guarantees you offer. For example, don't offer a large plagiarism bond unless you can actually pay it if the Buyer does find plagiarism in your work.
NO PLAGIARISM BOND - Guarantee that if the Buyer finds any plagiarism in the Writer's work, the Writer will pay them a pre-agreed sum of money.
AMENDMENTS TIME - If the work doesn't meet the requirements of the Buyer's original order, the Writer may offer a time period in which the Buyer can contact the Writer for amendments.
% REFUND FOR LATE DELIVERY - If the Writer do not deliver the work within the timescale agreed on, this is the percentage of the Writer's fee that the Writer is willing to refund to the Buyer.
COPYRIGHT INCLUDED - If the Writer sells the copyright with their work, the Buyer is permitted to hand the work in as if it was their own. If the Writer does not, the Buyer is not permitted to hand the work in as their own and must use the work instead as if it was a book or journal they had found.
NO RESALE/PUBLISH TO OTHERS - If the Writer offer this guarantee, the Writer can never sell or publish part or all of the Writer's work to another person - even after a year or two year, for example, have passed.
GUARANTEED MARK - If the Writer guarantee the Buyer's mark, the Writer promises that, if they do not achieve the standard they paid for (e.g. 1st, 2.1, 2.2) the Writer will refund their money on the provision of reasonable proof.
Currently, EssayBay lists essay standards by UK university labels. Here's a guide to what the Buyer should expect. Please note that all universities use different grading systems - many universities in the UK, for example, will only mark up to about 80%, whereas the Open University will use the full range up to 100%. The Buyer and Writer should therefore focus on the quality of the work described below for the standard they have agreed on.
1st Class Standard: Approximate Mark 70-80%
A 1st Class piece will display most, if not all, of the following characteristics:
-
special signs of excellence such as unusual clarity, excellence of presentation, originality of argument
-
comprehensive knowledge of the subject
-
excellent understanding of issues and debates
-
confidence in the selection and interpretation of materials/authority
-
logical and convincing development of an argument
-
written style appropriate to the level of the work
-
fluent and articulate expression
-
correct use of academic referencing
-
evidence of independent thought and judgment in answering the question
2:1 Standard: Approximate Mark 60-70%
A 2:1 piece will display most, if not all, of the following characteristics:
-
a richer and more developed argument than a 2:2, with a clearly stated and well argued conclusion, showing the ability to range over appropriate areas of the subject matter with acuteness of analysis, intelligent challenges to the question set, and an abundance of appropriate authority or evidence intelligently applied
-
thorough knowledge of the subject; few if any minor factual errors
-
good understanding of issues and debates
-
ability to select and interpret appropriate material/authority
-
solid development of an argument
-
a written style appropriate to the level of the work
-
clear expression
-
correct use of academic referencing
-
a balanced and well considered answer to the question
2:2 Standard: Approximate Mark 50-60%
A 2:2 piece will display most, if not all, of the following characteristics:
-
a considered argument marshalling some of the advantages and disadvantages, where appropriate, with well selected authority or evidence
-
adequate, although incomplete, knowledge of the subject; some factual errors
-
satisfactory understanding of issues and debates
-
reasonable, although flawed, ability to select and interpret appropriate material/authority
-
some flaws or gaps in the construction of an argument
-
a written style not entirely appropriate for study at the level of work
-
poor or unclear expression
-
incorrect use of academic referencing
-
a partial or incomplete answer to the question
3rd Standard: Approximate Mark 40-50%
A piece in this grade band will display most, if not all, of the following characteristics:
-
some signs of use of relevant evidence to tackle the question, even though treatment may be one sided or scant
-
incomplete knowledge of the subject; some factual errors
-
some understanding of issues or debates
-
some difficulty with the selection and interpretation of appropriate material/authority
-
some flaws or gaps in the construction of an argument
-
a written style inappropriate for study at this level
-
expression that is not always clear or consistent
-
incorrect use of academic referencing
-
a partial or incomplete answer to the question
Fail: Approximate Mark 39% or less
A piece in this grade band will display most, if not all, of the following characteristics:
-
irrelevant content, vagueness, error, general lack of understanding
-
limited knowledge of the subject
-
significant factual errors
-
little understanding or actual misunderstanding of the issues and debates
-
severe difficulty in selecting and interpreting material
-
illogical or incomplete development of argument
-
a written style entirely inappropriate for study at this level
-
confused, muddled or misleading, or incoherent expression
-
incorrect use or absence of academic referencing
-
too short

If you have any further questions,
why not look at our FAQs?

If you are looking for our terms and conditions,
please click here.

Alternatively, if you need to contact us, please
click here.